April 16, 1980
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals held that that the trial court erred in narrowly construing 18 U.S.C. § 208(a) to save it from being unconstitutionally vague where neither the statutory terms or legislative history mandated that interpretation. The statute must be construed to show legislative intent and even interpreted with the correct legislative intent, section 208(a) was not unconstitutionally vague.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3953241862946949033&q=628+f.2d+150&hl=en&as_sdt=20006